Phenomenology as an illogical stage

The English version was published online.

When talking to others

Accept the whole person in that moment.

I'll try to use their words to describe it.

Putting other things on the back burner in order to focus on one thing.

We don't agree on everything."

Any system can be clearly expressed (formalized) in terms of a single point.

That "point" is not the same in relation to other things.

There's another implication in the later part of the story.

The "different" is clear. So what is "the same"?

What in the world can be "that point" of "commonness" in terms of moving across several clear expressions (formulations)?

That's not a public commitment.

A strange order reacting to various explicit expressions (formulations)

Converting expressions is a painstaking process

No single consistent pattern would be able to encompass the entirety of "the point"

When something comes to mind, wait quietly until the words come out.

If you get interrupted in the middle, you forget even "exactly what you were going to say".

attributed to the fundamental unit

Eugene Gendlin: "We should be able to cross all three."

phenomenology

Eugene Gendlin, "The Phenomenologist Had the Other Half of My Method."

I knew that "a point" was a clear expression (formulation) of this.

Criticism that Sartre and the Hegelian school did not find what Merleau-Ponty found in "function" and "refinement".

hussar

How "conflicted approach" can "lift

Three.

For Dilthey, the experience process is understanding

Understanding that we are created within

They are examples of what it is about, because individual advances can create more of the other

Should I also explain Hegel's story lightly?

phenomenology

Phenomenology is some kind of progress in the thinking stage

Experience Process and Meaning Creation Raises Seven New Advances

Carl Rogers

How new consciousness can be collated against organismic experience to validate emerging oppressions

He "searched for the corresponding truth."

Eugene Gendlin.

another way

Instead of looking for certain experiences prior to symbolization

Several steps

It became the "Experience Process Scale."

Carl Rogers

On becoming a Person

Steps Teaching Method

Now called Focusing.

Psychotherapy is failing to teach how to do it.

Prefer to give expertise

Questions about things

Die Frage nach dem Ding.: Heidegger,

You write that Heidegger thanked you with a nice afterword.

"What Is a Thing?"

by Martin Heidegger (Author), W. B. Barton Jr. (Translator), Vera Deutsch (Translator), Eugene T. Gendlin (Contributor)

Not this way?

The former, from the table of contents, looks like Eugene Gendlin won't be showing up.

Many philosophers are

Avoiding physics for fear of bringing reductionism into philosophy

Avoid bringing in psychology and avoid human experiential processes.

Heidegger believed that everything had to be brought in.

Statehood, not emotion

"Dwelling," "statehood," misunderstood.

Difficult to understand that "investiture" has meaning in "mood."

Difficult to see that "home - thinking" is found and implemented

Heidegger left phenomenology and attributed events to "history"

As a result, the "phenomenon" has become inseparable from language and history.

Many people misinterpreted that as "every experience is an old idea."

Heidegger believed that history occurs in "dwelling

Thinking-Dwelling."

Phenomena are not isolated; all experience is dependent

Failure to assume that there is a neutral, uninterpreted "phenomenon"

It went on to assume that every experience derives entirely from an implicit assumption that can only be broken by discontinuity

Overlooking illogical transitions.

When we understand exactly the complexity of the formation, when it transcends its form

When you don't understand it, all you can do is quote it.

To understand is to "dwell - think" "within" the form

This is a more accurate understanding than "keeping" the formality

When you don't understand, all you can do is follow the pattern.

When understood accurately, the mold is broken.

"Further -movement -seeking -order."

~ is intricate and complex rather than a consistent principle

Has more order (order) than formed form

Coercively accurate feedback

process of experience

Richer and wiser than fixed forms

It's called disorder.

It means both "no logical order"

More complex and sensible than the order formed

Disorganized, but working in an orderly fashion.

There is a higher order and a lower order.

The lower order here is, for example, "that the page is in a folder that represents its classification."

Scrapbox is richer and smarter than fixed hierarchical classifications."

I have a feeling you're right.

Finding "internal" differences "toward a voluntary process.

It's not arbitrary.

Individual movements end up as motionless contradictions.

He believes that the overthrow of order is disorder.

When Dionysian experience works with pre-existing kinds of experience, it creates more order than ever before.

Not a mere lack of pre-existing order.

Nor is it the product of an order implicitly imposed and formed.

Nietzsche's Body-Knowledge, Scheleiermacher, Dilthey, Merleau-Ponty, Heidegger

This order can think and study itself, an intermittent reaffirmation of

Such thinking is not just fuzzy [felt sense

The work of understanding "precisely" transcends disconnection and form (distinctions and overall patterns).

---